Topic: Ok people... (Read 7799 times)

andyn · « **Reply #25 on:** October 21, 2009, 11:12:23 pm »

3.62 with more than a few cans inside me...

rsm · « **Reply #26 on:** October 21, 2009, 11:28:18 pm »

3.33 for me. Who's setting up the league table???

andygh · « **Reply #27 on:** October 21, 2009, 11:40:41 pm »

Quote

Ah, yes, good people...but would you kindly and honestly state how long you took doing it? My attempt (at 7.51) took just under 1.5 minutes as I thought it was just a bit of fun...this thing is getting some momentum....which silly 'xxx' started all this!? BY.

About a minute why?

Dreadstar · « **Reply #28 on:** October 22, 2009, 12:11:16 am »

4.40 for me I'm afraid.

Damien · « **Reply #29 on:** October 22, 2009, 12:55:06 am »

3 tries approx 1 minute each
6.32
7.53
3.20

derekwarner · « **Reply #30 on:** October 22, 2009, 06:25:43 am »

mmmmmmmmmmmmm sorry

6.8 seconds on my 24" HD flat panel

......my first attempt at home this morning
14.2 seconds on a 19" CRT monitor

later @ work on my second attempt
With subsequent trials on the 19" CRT ...I could not get below 11 seconds

The CRT certainly does distort beyond what we think we see

...........Derek

OK...so on reflection I wondered if the work results were altered by work stress

......so after returning from work + two glasses of wine to relax....

....you guessed the latest score my 24" HD flat panel

13.9 seconds ...I rest my case your honour

kiwi · « **Reply #31 on:** October 22, 2009, 08:08:20 am »

4.22 at first go, and I'm as blind as a bat
kiwi

ActionWeb · « **Reply #32 on:** October 22, 2009, 09:08:28 am »

Quote from: derekwarner_decoy on October 22, 2009, 06:25:43 am

mmmmmmmmmmmmm sorry

6.8 seconds on my 24" HD flat panel ......my first attempt at home this morning
14.2 seconds on a 19" CRT monitor later @ work on my second attempt
With subsequent trials on the 19" CRT ...I could not get below 11 seconds

The CRT certainly does distort beyond what we think we see ...........Derek

OK...so on reflection I wondered if the work results were altered by work stress ......so after returning from work + two glasses of wine to relax.... ....you guessed the latest score my 24" HD flat panel

13.9 seconds ...I rest my case your honour

Umm...
The score isn't time. It's deviation from the correct results. The lower the number, the more accurate you are.

ActionWeb · « **Reply #33 on:** October 22, 2009, 09:11:04 am »

Quote from: Bryan Young on October 21, 2009, 11:06:17 pm

this thing is getting some momentum....which silly 'xxx' started all this!? BY.

Me. Someone sent it to me and I thought it would appeal to you lot.

Patternmaker · « **Reply #34 on:** October 22, 2009, 09:39:04 am »

2.72 just under 2 minutes, as my headmaster would have said could do better.

derekwarner · « **Reply #35 on:** October 22, 2009, 09:59:00 am »

OK.....thanks ActionWeb........."Umm...The score isn't time. It's deviation from the correct results. The lower the number, the more accurate you are"

apologies....yes ...even in OZ ...with enough glasses of wine I can confuse units of measure .......

Derek

PS....the resultant did not necessarily improve my score

cbr900 · « **Reply #36 on:** October 22, 2009, 01:26:36 pm »

Just had two goes, the first was to understand the second counted,

3.77 that will do me for an old git..............

Roy

Bryan Young · « **Reply #37 on:** October 22, 2009, 04:57:02 pm »

OK, I retire "hurt"! BY.

jonny shoreboy · « **Reply #38 on:** October 22, 2009, 08:06:58 pm »

6.31 in about a minute on my first go. Now that I see it's a comp I am going to have another go...

over_powered84 · « **Reply #39 on:** October 23, 2009, 01:23:43 pm »

Woohoo 7.33 Despite Never Having Heard Of A Bisect Angle

dodgy geezer · « **Reply #40 on:** October 23, 2009, 04:11:29 pm »

I got 4.0 on my first go, which I thought was good. Then I called my son, who sat down and scored 2.31 on his first go, including a couple of sub 1s. Interestingly, that would have put him fourth on the board, but he was not asked for a name or anything....

Ah, what it is to have young eyesight! Or, perhaps, a non-distorting CRT...

Klunk · « **Reply #41 on:** October 25, 2009, 07:32:52 pm »

Hagar · « **Reply #42 on:** October 25, 2009, 08:25:20 pm »

2,88 second go. Paralelgram thingie is a "xxxxx"!

SteamboatPhil · « **Reply #43 on:** October 25, 2009, 08:25:34 pm »

Humm 7.95 on my first go

Now must try again

chingdevil · « **Reply #44 on:** October 25, 2009, 10:27:24 pm »

3.70 second try, must get out more

dodgy geezer · « **Reply #45 on:** October 25, 2009, 10:59:43 pm »

Turns out to be quite easy to cheat, by placing a rule on the screen......

News:

Author Topic: Ok people... (Read 7799 times)

andyn

rsm

andygh

Dreadstar

Damien

kiwi

ActionWeb

ActionWeb

Patternmaker

jonny shoreboy

over_powered84

Hagar

chingdevil