Model Boat Mayhem

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length.
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Underwater Cannon?!  (Read 3573 times)

Martin (Admin)

  • Administrator
  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 23,731
  • Location: Peterborough, UK
    • Model Boat Mayhem
Underwater Cannon?!
« on: December 03, 2013, 02:46:57 pm »

Logged
"This is my firm opinion, but what do I know?!" -  Visit the Mayhem FaceBook Groups!  &  Giant Models

Netleyned

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,055
  • Location: Meridian Line, Mouth of the Humber
    • cleethorpes mba
Re: Underwater Cannon?!
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2013, 04:33:32 pm »

Hmmm
Bit like an ashtray on a motorbike %%

Ned
Logged
Smooth seas never made skilful sailors
Up Spirits  Stand fast the Holy Ghost.
http://www.cleethorpesmba.co.uk/

DavieTait

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,149
  • Location: Fraserburgh
Re: Underwater Cannon?!
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2013, 06:11:11 pm »



The bullet went about 6ft so a cannon would be utterly useless lol
Logged
Davie Tait,
Scotland

Bob K

  • Bob K
  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,686
  • Location: Windsor
Re: Underwater Cannon?!
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2013, 07:52:30 pm »

In the trial and error evolution of naval architecture the concept is no sillier than many that actually got built.   
The ram, the dynamite gun, steam powered submarines with funnels, and circular hulled warships that spun like a top when the guns were fired.  Then there were armoured hulls with vulnerable paddle wheels, and battleships with guns so heavy that freeboard was almost non existent.  Add to the later a full square rig and HMS Captain must rank amongst the most ill advised.
Logged
HMS Skirmisher (1905), HMS Amazon (1906), HMS K9 (1915), Type 212A (2002), HMS Polyphemus (1881), Descartes (1897), Iggle Piggle boat (CBBC), HMS Royal Marine (1943), HMS Marshall Soult, HMS Agincourt (1912)

TailUK

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,672
  • Location: East Midlands
Re: Underwater Cannon?!
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2013, 09:15:02 am »



The bullet went about 6ft so a cannon would be utterly useless lol
Presumably a cannon shot would go further given the larger charge.  If the boats involved were laid alongside as if for boarding the underwater cannon would fairly rip the enemy boat apart.  All in a pretty daft idea but I could see working on principle if they didn't sink their own boat in the process.
Cool picture by the way!
Logged
No human society has ever functioned without models to capture, explain,disseminate,
persuade, sell, reinforce and analyse all kinds of ideas, values, concepts and situations.

Pondweed

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Model Boat Mayhem Forum is Great!
Re: Underwater Cannon?!
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2013, 01:25:17 am »

I thought you were going to bring up the 'Davis Torpedo Gun', a weapon that mixed the worst aspects of the torpedo and the gun.  :o O0 It was a normal torpedo with a short approx 5inch gun at the front along with some explosive in the warhead.

The idea behind it was that a ordinary torpedo exploded against the ships side or just within the hull wasteing some of the explosive force, the designer of the above weapon thought how much better it would be if the detonation was in the middle of the hull 'amongst the ships vitals'.

The torpedo was fired the normal way and when it hit the ships side, the internal cannon was triggered and fired a shell into the ship... the momentum of the torpedo may in cases be enough for the head to pierce the side before firing the cannon. The torpedoes warhead then detonated.

Such a double-whammy would ruin many a sailors day.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.088 seconds with 23 queries.